All posts by n8rngtd.top

BCCI deadbats Amarnath's comments

The BCCI has chosen not to respond to the comments made by former selector Mohinder Amarnath in which he said that MS Dhoni’s sacking from the captaincy role after the tour of Australia was blocked by the BCCI president

ESPNcricinfo staff12-Dec-2012The BCCI has chosen not to respond to the comments made by former selector Mohinder Amarnath in which he said that MS Dhoni’s sacking from the captaincy role after the tour of Australia was blocked by the BCCI president.”We don’t wish to respond to these allegations at this point when the team is due to play a Test,” Sanjay Jagdale, the BCCI secretary, told ESPNcricinfo. “But I want to say that the BCCI has full confidence in the captain and the coach and we are fully supportive of the team. “According to Amarnath, the selectors wanted to appoint a young captain after India’s Test losses in Australia, but N Srinivasan, the BCCI president, intervened to overrule the selector’s decision. There was massive speculation that Amarnath’s disagreements with the board were the reason his term as a selector ended abruptly when he was actually expected to be the new chairman of the selectors.However, Rajeev Shukla, the IPL chairman, denied any such events happened. “I will not go into what he [Amarnath] has said,” Shukla said. “I don’t think it is appropriate to give statements like this. Whatever one has to say, one can say while participating in the [selection] meeting. Making comments about it, I think, it is not appropriate as it creates some kind of perception in the minds of players and fans. Selectors are independent. They are not under any pressure.”

Man found guilty of racism at ODI

A man has been fined after racially abusing three young spectators during the ODI between England and South Africa at West End in August

George Dobell14-Jan-2013A man has been fined after racially abusing three young spectators during the ODI between England and South Africa at West End on August 28.John Guinelly, a 44-year-old from Portsmouth, was ordered to pay each victim £500 by Southampton Magistrates’ Court, with his actions towards the children described by magistrates as “threatening and abusive”.Hampshire Police launched an investigation after the incident when the three children, aged 11, 13 and 14, returned to their seats having purchased food during the match only to find that Guinelly and two other men had taken their places.Guinelly first pretended he could not understand the children – the court heard he said “are they talking Dutch or something?” – and then used racist phrases when stewards asked him to move. Later, as Guinelly was being spoken to by stewards and police, he spotted one of the children and delivered another racist insult.While Guinelly did not attend court, he send a letter stating that he would plead guilty to racially or religiously aggravated harassment, alarm or distress. He claimed his comments were “friendly banter”. He was also ordered to pay £65 court costs.

Players face bans if they take part in Cricket Wars

Players who take part in the unofficial Cricket Wars tournament face a lengthy ban from the game after Cricket Kenya refused to sanction the event

Martin Williamson12-Feb-2013Players who take part in the unofficial Cricket Wars tournament, which is scheduled to take place in Nairobi over three days starting on Friday (February 15), face a lengthy ban from the game after Cricket Kenya confirmed its decision not to give its approval to the event.Reports in the local media suggested that the Ministry of Youth and Sports had brokered a deal after calling a meeting between organisers and CK but this was denied by a board spokesman who said there remained questions as to the finances behind the venture and CK unanimously voted not to give its approval. This stance has been backed by all the country’s provincial boards.As a consequence of this, no overseas players, past or present, will be permitted to participate. If they do then the ICC has made clear that they will be in contravention of its own regulations and are likely to face hefty sanctions including bans of at least one year. The same applies to all local players and officials.High-profile names such as Andrew Symonds, Damien Martyn, Ian Harvey and Chris Cairns are believed to have obtained NOCs, which allow them to play overseas, from their own boards but it is not clear if those boards or individuals were aware the tournament had not been sanction by CK. ESPNcricinfo understands the ICC is writing to all boards to advise them that Cricket Wars is an unapproved event, something that seems likely to lead to the withdrawal of the NOCs.Although the organisers have said that Muttiah Muralitharan is one of the players taking part, ESPNcricinfo has learned that he received an invitation earlier in the month which he declined.The Cricket Wars organisers, who include former KCA boss Sharad Ghai, claim that former players do not need any approval to play in such events but the ICC has confirmed this is not the case.Local cricketers will make up the numbers, and even those who are paid are unlikely to earn more than $50, but will also face sanctions if they take part. While for club cricketers these punishments are unlikely to be serious, centrally-contracted national players face fines and/or suspensions. The Nairobi Provincial Cricket Association has made clear that the priority for local players is to participate in this weekend’s knock-out tournament.It is also possible the Nairobi Gymkhana club, which is hosting the competition, will face punishment if it goes ahead. CK is understood to have written to club officials last month to raise concerns that they should not stage a non-approved event but that was met with a response that as a private club what games they ran was of no concern to the national board. However, the board has it within its power to withhold grants and not stage official matches there.Concerns have also been expressed at the details of the money likely to be paid over from the event to a local charity. ESPNcricinfo has learned that while it is being flagged proceeds would go to the Children’s Village in Naivasha, in fact only an undisclosed percentage of the gate money will be paid over.

Harris gets three as Tigers fight

Ryan Harris’ three wickets in his return to first-class cricket after an 11-month absence ensured Queensland did not allow Tasmania to get away

ESPNcricinfo staff07-Mar-2013
ScorecardRyan Harris’ three wickets in his return to first-class cricket after an 11-month absence ensured Queensland did not allow Tasmania to get away after the visitors were sent in to bat at the Gabba.The Bulls must win outright to keep in contention for the Sheffield Shield final, and were initially frustrated by a stubborn opening stand from Mark Cosgrove and Jordan Silk.However, Harris and James Hopes made frequent incisions thereafter to keep the Tigers in check, despite a fluent 82 by Jon Wells which held the middle order together.Harris’ ability to get through 25 overs for the day will hearten the national selectors ahead of the Ashes later this year, though they will be mindful of how he backs up from the exertions later in the match following a long lay-off due to shoulder surgery.

Bangladesh to host Asia Cup

The 2014 Asia Cup will be held in Bangladesh after original hosts India cited a tight international schedule as the main reason for being unable to organise the tournament

Nagraj Gollapudi13-Apr-2013The 2014 Asia Cup will be held in Bangladesh after India, who had originally agreed to play hosts, cited a packed international schedule as the main reason for being unable to organise the tournament. The likely dates for the tournament will be February 24 to March 8. The decision was taken at the Asian Cricket Council (ACC) board meeting on April 8 in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, where India informed the other ACC members that they were focused instead on finalising the itinerary for the New Zealand tour, scheduled to be held in February-March next year.It is understood that Bangladesh volunteered to host the Asia Cup and even decided to postpone the scheduled tri-series involving Sri Lanka and Pakistan, which was to be held around the same period. According to an official privy to the minutes of the meeting, the dates could be changed again considering India have been facing “hiccups” in negotiating dates with Cricket New Zealand.The BCCI has been trying to convince New Zealand Cricket to
trim their schedule of the New Zealand tour to two Tests, two ODIs and two T20Is to enable India to participate in the Asia Cup. The ICC’s Future Tours Programme (FTP) has India scheduled to play three Tests, five ODIs and a single Twenty20 international.Hosting the Asia Cup does throw Bangladesh’s FTP schedules into disarray. According to the FTP, Bangladesh are set to host Sri Lanka for two Tests and three ODIs from the second week of February. A tri-nation series is also scheduled involving Sri Lanka and Pakistan immediately after, and just before the World Twenty20s begin on March 16.

Faisalabad and Sialkot in final after thrillers

A round-up of the Faysal Bank Super Eight T-20 Cup semi-final matches played on March 30, 2013

Umar Farooq30-Mar-2013
ScorecardWith nine required of the final over, promising fast bowler Ehsan Adil conceded just six to help Faisalabad Wolves win a thriller against Lahore Lions and reach the final of the Faysal Bank Super Eight T-20 Cup in Lahore.Though the first ball of Adil’s over went four, and the next was a wide that reduced the equation to four off five balls, Adil kept his cool. The second legitimate ball of the over produced a wicket as Sohail Ahmed, who threatened to take the game away, was dismissed after mistiming a pull. Another wide was bowled, followed by two dot balls as the No. 9 Adnan Rasool failed to connect.That made it three required off two. Rasool missed a third ball in a row, and decided to attempt a bye, but with the non-striker not responding, both batsmen were at the bowler’s end when the wicketkeeper broke the stumps. The final ball of the match left No. 11 Aizaz Cheema needing to take three, and he too failed to connect and was run out by the keeper Mohammad Salman, giving Wolves the game.Wolves didn’t seem to have a defendable target after they opted to bat, posting 125. Opener Farrukh Shehzad slashed Aizaz Cheema between gully and point for a boundary, followed by a dashing drive through extra cover, to take nine of the first over as the openers put on 22. Misbah ul-Haq (19) and Khurram Shehzad (27) put on 45 for the third wicket, with the Wolves passing 100 in the 16th over with the help of Imran Khalid’s cameo of 20 off 15 balls.At the halfway stage, Lions were favourites, given Wolves’ moderate total, and that Lions had seven cricketers with international experience in their ranks, including the Twenty20 national captain, Mohammad Hafeez.The Lions announced their charge with three boundaries off the first over from openers Ahmed Shehzad and Nasir Jamshed. Shehzad fell to a brilliant catch behind by Salman with the score on 13. Jamshed (46) and Hafeez (36) put on a solid 57-run partnership, and Lions looked comfortably on course to overhaul the Wolves’ total.A double-strike by Adil in the 11th over brought Wolves back into the game, as he removed Kamran Akmal and Ali Azmat. From being 81 for 2 in 10 overs, Lions ended up losing seven wickets for 38. Once Jamshed was run out by Samiullah with the score on 99, the Wolves’ smelt the possibility of victory. Sohail Ahmed’s 19 kept the Lions in the hunt, but Adil’s superb final over handed Wolves the victory.
Scorecard
Sialkot Stallions raced into the final after a thrilling victory over Rawalpindi Rams at the Gaddafi Stadium. The match went into the final over with Rawalpindi needing eight runs, but the vastly experienced Naved-ul-Hasan picked up three wickets to bowl Rams out and clinch a three-run victory. Stallions, defending champions of Faysal Bank Super Eights, will take on Faisalabad Wolves in the final on Sunday.After opting to bat first, Stallions got off to a steady start with the openers adding 23 off 21 before Shakeel Ansar (7) was trapped lbw by Yasir Arafat, followed by the dismissal of Shahid Yousuf (16). In a bid to improvise, Naved-ul-Hasan was promoted up in the order, but the idea backfired and Naved was back in hut with 15 off 22 balls. By the end of 15th over, Stallions were in trouble at 96 for 5.Their captain Shoaib Malik drove five boundaries to compile 44 off 35 balls to take Stallions past 100 and Mansoor Amjad hit 18 off 11 with the help of a six over long-off to propel Stallions to a respectable total of 139.Rams, in reply, lost three wickets within five overs with 31 runs on board. It was Umar Amin (24) along with Umar Waheed who kept them the game from slipping away with a defiant 37-run stand. Sohail Tanvir chipped in with three boundaries for his 17 off 16 balls but wasn’t enough to keep the chase on course, leaving Waheed (44 not out) to resist all alone in the middle with no batsman providing him support, which left Rams two runs short.

Pietersen out of Champions Trophy

Kevin Pietersen has been ruled out of the Champions Trophy and could face a race to be fit in time for the Ashes as he continues his rehabilitation from a knee injury

Alan Gardner24-Apr-2013Kevin Pietersen has been ruled out of the Champions Trophy and could face a race to be fit in time for the Ashes as he continues his rehabilitation from a knee injury. The ECB said on Wednesday that it expected Pietersen to resume full training in mid-June, less than four weeks before the first Test against Australia at Trent Bridge on July 10.Pietersen missed the third Test of England’s tour of New Zealand after suffering bruising to his right knee and it had already been announced that the batsman would not be considered for the return series, starting next month. Playing in the Champions Trophy was the next target but it has been deemed that he will not be ready for the tournament, which runs from June 6-23.An ECB statement read: “Kevin Pietersen has been ruled out of the ICC Champions Trophy following a repeat MRI scan on his right knee earlier today. The scan has shown some improvement in the bruising to the bone that occurred in the build up to the Test Series against New Zealand in February. However Pietersen will not have recovered sufficiently in time for the NatWest one-day series against New Zealand beginning May 31 and the Champions Trophy which follows. Pietersen will now start a graduated rehabilitation program with a view to resuming full training by the middle of June.”The news is not altogether unexpected, with England taking a cautious approach to managing Pietersen’s knee problem ahead of back-to-back Ashes series, and comes shortly after the announcement of Australia’s touring squad. Pietersen has been wearing a brace to aid his recovery, although there is currently no suggestion that surgery will be required.When he flew home from New Zealand, where he was injured in a warm-up match at Queenstown, a timeframe of eight weeks was given, forcing his withdrawal from the entire IPL. The two home Tests against New Zealand, beginning on May 16, would also have come too soon but his absence for the Champions Trophy is a blow to England’s hopes of winning a global 50-over competition for the first time.Should his recovery progress as the ECB hopes, Pietersen could play for Surrey in the Championship against Yorkshire starting on June 21. England then have a four-day game against Essex starting on June 30 to prepare for the Ashes although even that schedule would only leave him a maximum eight days of first-class cricket since the middle of March.Pietersen returned to England’s ODI team for the first time in almost a year against India in January after his temporary retirement from limited-overs internationals in 2012. England’s rotation policy meant Jonathan Trott was rested for that series, with Joe Root making an immediate impression in the middle order and when Pietersen sat out the ODIs in New Zealand, Root improved his record to 326 runs at 81.50.With Trott, Alastair Cook and Ian Bell all expected to bat at the top of the order, England will now be heavily reliant on Eoin Morgan to provide the sort of impetus that Pietersen is capable of in one-day cricket. The priority of retaining the Ashes, however, is clearly of greater concern.

BCCI's agent mandate evokes mixed response

The recent mandate by the BCCI to regulate players’ agents has elicited mixed feelings amongst entities who could be otherwise classified as agents

Amol Karhadkar23-May-2013It took the current spot-fixing crisis for the BCCI to first acknowledge the existence of player agents and then decide to regulate them. The decision has evoked a mixed response from player agents – none of whom, in fact, like to be referred to as an “agent”.Latika Khaneja and Lokesh Sharma, who were two of the most prominent figures in the industry 10 years ago, are not overjoyed by the BCCI’s decision. Khaneja, director of Collage Sports Management, recently decided to give up managing cricketers, as she felt it was just another way for the BCCI to control things. “The BCCI feels it should only manipulate players and their representatives. There is a perception that all agents are susceptible,” Khaneja said. “Honesty and track record must be taken into consideration while dealing with player agents, but since this is not the case, neither Lokesh, nor I, [will be] in the business.”Khaneja managed Virender Sehwag for well over a decade during his early years. “I feel it’s just another nail in the coffin by the BCCI. It’s a BCCI tool to control the player agents, because they would like to hold all the rights of the cricketers. They also want to control agents now,” she said.Newer agents have, however, welcomed the decision. Atul Srivastava, founder of Gaames Unlimited, an agency that manages 20 Indian cricketers, including R Ashwin, Ajinkya Rahane and Umesh Yadav, referred to it as a “positive step”. Bunty Sajdeh, CEO of Cornerstone Sport & Entertainment – which manages Virat Kohli and Rohit Sharma – felt that “only good will come out of it”.Major sporting leagues across the globe like the NBA, NHL, MLB and AFL conduct
certification exams for aspiring agents. However, it would be an achievement of sorts if the BCCI can replicate Cricket Australia’s (CA) model of screening an agent who applies to be an official player representative.Srivastava, a former army officer, who entered sports management in 2004, supported the idea of certification. “You will have to do it step by step,” Srivastava said. “This certification will cut down at least a few people at some level. In the NBA or FIFA, for example, you need to have a certain amount of experience before you can become an authorised agent; you need to have some qualification like an MBA degree or experience in the industry. If not, then you have to do the exam.”The problem is complicated in India – though it exists abroad as well – with the blurred lines between a player’s friend or family, and the agent. Jiju Janardhan, arrested as an alleged bookie, was not just Sreesanth’s close friend, but also allegedly posed as his agent while dealing with the betting mafia. And Janardhan’s case is not an aberration. For every Khaneja or Sajdeh, there is at least one Janardhan in Indian cricket.Khaneja has a pet name, ‘Ruby’, for such agents who blur the line between professionalism and being a player’s ‘friend’. “I must have seen so many Jiju Janardhans because every player has a Ruby. If a Ruby is not credible, then these poor boys (young cricketers) are taken for a ride. But a smart cricketer will manage his Ruby,” she said. “Ishant Sharma had such a Ruby who used to tell the whole world that he was his agent. When I was managing Ishant, this Ruby threw a birthday party, and didn’t know Ishant had invited me. When I reached the venue, he disappeared in no time and never faced me.”Not many of these player-managers realise what exactly their role is, according to Lokesh Sharma, who managed Rahul Dravid through most of his international career. “In India, there’s hardly any player management,” Lokesh said. “We don’t find any athlete representation. A player-manager’s role is different to what it is perceived to be.”But there are some like Srivastava and Sajdeh who look over and above an IPL contract. “We think of ourselves as managers of players, not agents whose job is to do a deal and take a cut,” Srivastava said. “The manager develops a team around a player. The team is made up of experts in finance, legal and PR whose job is to deal with investments, contracts, and handle their off-field appearances in public. There are three sets of people at work for every player. We want to be a professional organisation, and the IPL is not the tomorrow we are looking at. We are looking to work with players who will play for India.”Managing Indian cricketers has become one of the toughest balancing acts at this juncture, but there’s been a rise in the number of player-managers. While most of the national cricketers, and those on the fringes are taken care of, the agents seem to have turned their focus towards the Under-19 crop, and the domestic players who can potentially be offered an IPL contract.Yudhajit Dutta, who was instrumental in getting MS Dhoni to sign up with Gameplan in 2007, said some agents were out to make quick money. “Sadly, most of them come in with an intention to make a quick buck, so you see them accompanying players everywhere for two or three years, and then they disappear,” Dutta said.”A lot is being made of agents hanging around players all the time. I don’t know if it’s a good or a bad thing. I think as long as you know when to give space to the player, it is fine,” said Dutta, who floated his own company, Purple People. “There are times when a player wants to share some space with his team-mates alone. If a manager doesn’t realise that, then the relationship between a player and him starts getting difficult.”With the scope for individual endorsements getting thinner and thinner, especially with the BCCI indirectly controlling most of the big spenders due to the IPL, it is these shadowy elements that are targeted by those indulging in nefarious activities. A player-manager, requesting anonymity, recounted one such incident: “During the 2010 IPL, I was approached by a bookie through a common friend. Since he had come over to meet me with the reference of a friend, I didn’t even imagine something like this would prop up. The moment he asked me to get inside information through my client, I refused and then reported the matter to the BCCI immediately.”Since agents were not recognised by the BCCI back then, there was little likelihood of any action being taken by the board. That moment, however, may have come now.

Sahara stalemate could continue till September

It’s been more than a month since Sahara India pulled their franchise Pune Warriors out of the IPL and, according to insiders from both Sahara and the BCCI, the stalemate is likely to continue till September

Amol Karhadkar25-Jun-2013It’s been more than a month since Sahara India pulled their franchise Pune Warriors out of the IPL and, according to insiders from both Sahara and the BCCI, the stalemate is likely to continue till September, when the board convenes for an annual general meeting. It is believed that the reason for the delay is that the Sahara issue has been overridden by the recent spot-fixing controversy, the fall-out of which led to a change in the BCCI top management with the president stepping aside till the probe panel completes its investigations.Despite Sahara’s public announcement of its quitting towards the end of the IPL, five weeks hence, the company hasn’t communicated its decision to the BCCI officially.”As of now, the stalemate continues. Saharashri (Subrata Roy) has made it clear in his interviews that the new BCCI management may result in Sahara continuing to be a part of the IPL,” says a senior Sahara functionary. “So the discussions are on at the moment, and nothing has been finalised yet.”The franchise had pulled out in May over financial differences with the BCCI stemming from the valuation of the annual franchise fee it has to pay. Since their inception into the IPL in 2011, Sahara and BCCI have been at loggerheads over the former’s annual franchise fees of Rs 170 crore, the highest in the IPL.Sahara had been demanding that the franchise fee from their original agreement should be recalculated proportionately since the minimum matches per year have been reduced to 14 from the 18 promised to them. As a result, both the parties had agreed to initiate arbitration procedures but the process hasn’t yet started due to their disagreement over judges for the arbitration process.According to IPL insiders, Sahara were unhappy when the Hyderabad franchise (formerly Deccan Chargers) was resold before the 2013 season to the Sun Group for an annual consideration of Rs 86 crore, almost half of Sahara’s annual fees. As a result, Sahara withheld its annual franchise fee, which resulted in the BCCI encashing the bank guarantee.The franchise agreement terms non-payment of franchise fees as an “irremediable breach”. It could result in the franchise’s termination without the need of serving a 30-day termination notice. The franchise agreement states that 30% of the annual payment has to be paid “on or before 2 January” every year. And the remaining 70% should be paid “on the date of the first match in the League in each such year”.”Either party may terminate this Agreement with immediate effect by written notice if the other party commits or permits an irremediable breach of this Agreement or if it is the subject of an Insolvency Event,” the franchise agreement says.In the past, the BCCI has taken action against defaulting franchises, including Rajasthan Royals, Kings XI Punjab and Kochi Tuskers Kerala. However, after encashing Sahara’s bank guarantee, the board seems to be buying time for now.”There is no reason for the board to act in haste. In fact, we would like to continue our association with all the team owners. If the problems are amicably resolved, there is no reason for us to take the inevitable step,” a BCCI insider said.The reason for the board’s guarded stance has nothing to do with Sahara being the title sponsors of the Indian team. Sahara stated it would continue its sponsorship till the end of December 2013, when the contract expires. What’s stalling the BCCI is that due to its internal crisis, nobody seems willing to take drastic measures.”In such a fragile environment, nobody wants to push for taking tough calls,” another insider said. “Who will be responsible in case a drastic step like terminating Sahara backfires in the court?”For the first time in its history, the BCCI’s working committee had asked its president Srinivasan to step aside till the probe against his son-in-law Gurunath Meiyappan and the IPL team that he owns – Chennai Super Kings – is complete. Let alone the legality of the appointment as an interim chief (Jagmohan Dalmiya), the legal status of the working committee meeting that ratified the decision is under question. If any of the BCCI members take the legal recourse, all these decisions – and those that have followed including the appointments of the incumbent secretary and treasurer – may turn void.In such an insecure environment, virtually every member is buying time till the annual general meeting (AGM) and hoping that both the probes constituted to examine the alleged wrongdoings of the players, teams and team owners would have concluded by September.Depending on the developments over the next three months, the BCCI AGM may see the return of Srinivasan as the BCCI president for another year, or see him pitted against Shashank Manohar, if the anti-Srinivasan lobby manages to convince the former president, Manohar, to return to the BCCI fold in a presidential election. But the third possibility – that of the current management continuing in case the probe commission, working without a deadline, hasn’t finished its work – is dreaded by many BCCI members.”While it may suit a certain group of officials, to a large extent, it will create plenty of problems, especially with the conduct of the IPL,” says a senior BCCI member. “We will have to decide whether to terminate Sahara and the two tainted teams (Rajasthan Royals and Super Kings), discuss possible replacements and most importantly, start gearing up for the big auction (in 2014) smoothly to detract sponsors from backing out. All this would need security for the decision-makers.”If the pace at which the probe commission has gone about its work over the last few weeks is an indication, one fears that it might only submit its findings sometime next year.

Zimbabwe lose four in tough chase of 241

Zimbabwe’s Select XI were asked to score the highest total of the match so far against Australia A when they were set a target of 241 to win the three-day match in Harare

ESPNcricinfo staff19-Jul-2013
Scorecard File photo – Zimbabwe’s hopes of chasing 241 rest on Hamilton Masakadza•AFP

Zimbabwe’s Select XI were asked to score the highest total of the match so far against Australia A when they were set a target of 241 to win the three-day match in Harare. As was the case in their first innings, their top order collapsed against the pace of Australia’s young quicks and they will have to rely on the lower order to restore respectability.They did a decent job of that earlier on the second day when they put on 60 runs to post a slight recovery from 82 for 5 overnight. Elton Chigumbura went without scoring and that proved a sign of things to come. He fell to Pakistani-born legspinner Fawad Ahmed, who ran through the tail.Malcolm Waller and Natsai Mushangwe shared a seventh-wicket stand of 31 but both were dismissed with the score on 113. Both succumbed to the pace bowlers, leaving Ahmed to deal with the remaining batsmen. He accounted for both Kyle Jarvis, whose score of 20 was the third-highest on the card, and Tendai Chatara to leave Zimbabwe’s XI 84 runs behind.Their bowlers made the day brighter, taking the first Australian wicket with the score on 11. Jarvis had Aaron Finch trapped lbw. David Warner’s Ashes ambitions took another knock as he managed just 11 while the runs came from Nic Maddinson and Alex Doolan.Partnerships were insubstantial apart from 55 between Doolan and Glenn Maxwell on a slow surface. Legspinner Mushangwe was among the wickets and claimed three while Elton Chigumbura accounted for the lower order as Australia lost their last six wickets for 21 runs.With their bowling having done a fine job in dismissing Australia A for 156, it was up to Zimbabwe’s batsmen to show some temperament but they could muster very little. Vusi Sibanda was out in the second over – bowled by Gurinder Sandhu – and Sikandar Raza followed in the next over. Zimbabwe were 1 for 2 and in a familiar position of strife.Brendan Taylor failed to make an impression in the match, out for 5, and the day ended with Waller also dismissed for 6. Hamilton Masakadza was still at the crease but will have to see off Ahmed and marshall the middle and lower order if Zimbabwe have any chances of registering an unlikely win.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus